2008 Woodie Awards
Gay pride events fail to make homosexuality 'normal'
James Schulte
Issue date: 4/24/06 Section: Opinion
June 5, 2006
I have always known that living this close to San Francisco, there would be fallout from the gay lifestyle. Ironically, on 6/6/06 that fallout is coming to De Anza College. On Tuesday, a bunch of drag queens are going to invade Conference Rooms A&B.
A nationally acclaimed draq queen, "Nova Starr" and any students or faculty members who are into gender-bending will be on display for all to see.
That's only the beginning. For the next three days after the drag show, they're going to hold panel discussions, a poetry slam, and then finally a dance to top off this folly of events.
I know I'm going against the mantra of diversity and tolerance, but the fact still remains that none of these planned events can be seen as anything close to normal.
What I have always thought was funny about the argument that homosexuals are normal is that it brings together two parties that are at odds with each other. Darwinists and creationists both believe that homosexuality is abnormal.
We know what the Bible says about "man laying with man." And in the world of Darwin, the homosexual creature would be considered an evolutionary dead end.
Without sexual reproduction, a species can't survive. So if you can't meet one of the basic needs of a living creature, the ability to procreate, you can't by any definition be considered normal.
No matter how many drag shows and dances gays at De Anza put on, they can't force us to believe that their lifestyle is normal.
What they are aiming for is to change the entire definition of the word.
By using these kind of events, and with the help of their Hollywood flunkeys, they want to keep beating people over the head and demanding that the idea of what is normal needs to be altered to fit their agenda.
We've already seen their agenda in action in Sacramento, where they are now voting to change our history book to emphasize the sexuality of historical figures.
I have always known that living this close to San Francisco, there would be fallout from the gay lifestyle. Ironically, on 6/6/06 that fallout is coming to De Anza College. On Tuesday, a bunch of drag queens are going to invade Conference Rooms A&B.A nationally acclaimed draq queen, "Nova Starr" and any students or faculty members who are into gender-bending will be on display for all to see.
That's only the beginning. For the next three days after the drag show, they're going to hold panel discussions, a poetry slam, and then finally a dance to top off this folly of events.
I know I'm going against the mantra of diversity and tolerance, but the fact still remains that none of these planned events can be seen as anything close to normal.
What I have always thought was funny about the argument that homosexuals are normal is that it brings together two parties that are at odds with each other. Darwinists and creationists both believe that homosexuality is abnormal.
We know what the Bible says about "man laying with man." And in the world of Darwin, the homosexual creature would be considered an evolutionary dead end.
Without sexual reproduction, a species can't survive. So if you can't meet one of the basic needs of a living creature, the ability to procreate, you can't by any definition be considered normal.
No matter how many drag shows and dances gays at De Anza put on, they can't force us to believe that their lifestyle is normal.
What they are aiming for is to change the entire definition of the word.
By using these kind of events, and with the help of their Hollywood flunkeys, they want to keep beating people over the head and demanding that the idea of what is normal needs to be altered to fit their agenda.
We've already seen their agenda in action in Sacramento, where they are now voting to change our history book to emphasize the sexuality of historical figures.
Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
Anonymous
posted 6/08/06 @ 2:31 PM PST
Gay rights is a second civil rights movement. In the past, people believed that interracial marriage was not natural. It is the same concept but in a different form. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/10/06 @ 10:36 AM PST
Dear Mr. James
First, I would like to thank you for writing the article in La Voz as it has helped to clarify some of the issues I have been having about how Christians deal with gays. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/12/06 @ 5:24 PM PST
James Schulte gives himself authoritative license to define ?normal? in his article ?Gay Pride Events Fail to Make Homosexuality ?Normal?? (June 5, 2006). (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 6/12/06 @ 8:28 PM PST
To Whom it May Concern;
I was appalled to see such slander in the newspaper of a college, which I thought would hold some intellectual credibility, even when it came to the opinions of your writers. (Continued…)
Anonymous
posted 7/20/06 @ 5:37 PM PST
First, you cannot define what is normal for sexuality with what is normal for biology. There are a host of ways to have sex that do not carry the possiblity of procreation. (Continued…)
no one
posted 12/03/08 @ 12:29 PM PST
The focus of this discussion seems to have been directed to "normality" which I have to disagree with most of you. Normality is, most definitely, definable. (Continued…)
Post a Comment